Kommentar: Einfügen von HTML im Kommentar: Link einfügen: <a href="LINKURL" target="_blank">LINKTITEL</a> Bild einfügen: <img src="BILDURL"> Text formatieren: <b>fetter Text</b> <i>kursiver Text</i> <u>unterstrichener Text</u> Kombinationen sind auch möglich z.B.: <b><i>fetter & kursiver Text</i></b> C Quellcode formatieren: <code>Quellcode</code> BASIC Quellcode formatieren: <basic>Quellcode</basic> (Innerhalb eines Quellcodeabschnitts ist kein html möglich.) Wichtig: Bitte mache Zeilenumbrüche, bevor Du am rechten Rand des Eingabefeldes ankommst ! -> I > > > > > > That's the best I can do. > > > I wonder if Paul is still interested and on line... > > > > > > Regards, > > > Pepe > > > > Hallo Pepe, > > > > it looks like Paul is faded away. > > The problem is, however, very interesting. > > If it still interests you, then test the two versions. > > "BitSequence-0.02" works with Timer1 and PortC5. > > > Hello everybody, > > I experimented still a little with the problem. > Maybe the result interests somebody. > "BitSequence-0.03" compares three versions. > 1. BitSequenceSimple: without timers > 2. BitSequenceTimer: using the so-called "Interpreter-Timer-Interrupts" > 3. BitSequenceAsm: jumps into an assembler-call > To give the so-called "Timer-Interrupts" a real chance, I tested it > with a 500µs interval. The winner is of course the "BitSequenceAsm-version". > For my astonishment, the "BitSequenceSimple-version" is more stable than > the "BitSequenceTimer-version". That also shows the limits of the > so-called "Interpreter-Interrupts". In addition the "BitSequenceTimer-version", > works first no more correctly, if we reduce the interval time. > Finally I come to the opinion, only the "BitSequenceAsm-version" is suitable > for implementation of a asynchronous serial communication protocol. > > Gruß Torsten
